Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 17 of 17
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    33
    Post Thanks / Like

    Trygon vs Mawloc?

    I just bought it, and I am wondering what I should assemble first. I am trying to assemble it today as I have a tourny tomorrow.

    Thanks for any help!

    Reply With Quote

  2. #2
    ... fishfishfish ... edmundblack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Fish-slapping CJB
    Posts
    26,557
    Post Thanks / Like
    Either one will get shot to shit as soon as it arrives. If you plan on Deep Striking it, I'd favour the Mawloc with that nice template attack it has coupled with the re-burrowing.

    This week I am good-naturedly shaking my fist at: Baragash. For being unreasonably reasonable.
    Sex, drugs and pointy ears.
    Cheaphammer 40p: 2000 points of Marines as cheap as possible.
    It'll be alright on the Knight - a slow refreshing of my original Grey Knight army.
    Cordova: In my head you're eight foot tall, always carry an officer's sabre, and speak like Theoden at the battle of Pelennor Fields.

    Grey Knights don't go to heaven: they go to hell and regroup.
    Reply With Quote

  3. #3
    Top Arm-Chair General Ron's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Alexandria, VA
    Posts
    11,446
    Post Thanks / Like
    Unless you can get a super unit surrounded and re-moved via Mawloc, Trygon all the way.

    Much better in CC, fleet, and an ok shooting attack. Making it a prime is fun too, although their is usually better things to pay points for.

    GW does not hate non-Space Marine armies. They just don't give a FAQ.

    This song is totally the Battle of Prospero:
    LanceWarrior: "1st rule of 40k forums rule-lawyering: Don't argue with Baragash"
    Yahtzee: "It's like owning a giant swiss-army knife with 500 different little blades and one folds out into a mini-gun. There is no reason to use anything else."
    Clicky in case of emergency
    Reply With Quote

  4. #4
    Hello Beeva! Beeva's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Notts, UK
    Posts
    2,025
    Post Thanks / Like
    Depends on how you're going to use it. With just a solitary one popping up on it's own with little support just to cause a disruption, then Mawloc all the way. It'll die, and that's wasted points on a Trygon.

    I'f you've got the support, or are planning on using it's tunnel to bring in reserves (however unreliable) then I'd go for a Trygon.

    Twitter: @Beevasaurus ---- Owner of a real life beaver. No, really.

    Wookieplus:
    "Beeva: WS5 BS5 S3 T3 W2 I5 A4 Ld7 Sv5+
    Unit Type: Infantry (unique)
    Wargear: Flak armour, Frag grenades, Sniper Rifle, Cigar
    Special Rules: Fearless, Stealth, Move Through Cover, Hit and Run, Fleet, Loner, He's Behind You!, Cigar"
    Reply With Quote

  5. #5
    Cryage's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    442
    Post Thanks / Like
    Problem I have with the Trygon (though it's stat block is nicer and a prime can act as a synapse) is that as soon as it pops it is instantly focus fired and killed. You basically want to drop it behind a unit that is already engaged in an assault to limit the number of shots on it.

    Reply With Quote

  6. #6
    devilclaw3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    57
    Post Thanks / Like
    i would go with thhe Mawloc because it is cheaper and it can do up to 3 str6 AP2 large blast attacks when it emerges and it doesnt scatter which is really cool. This ability can take out terminators for an armour spacemarine force. Large blast 2+ AP2 5+ invulnerable save roughly 8/10 terminators will be taken down and eaten. If they pass their leadership test then combat them with the Mawloc as it gives no armour saves and with a 5+ armour save i think they will be killed. If your up against assault terminators with thunder hammers i'll use a trygorn prime and mawloc. Use the Mawloc to try to take out the terminators and then use the firepower from the trygorn and then a 30 creature squad of devourer gaunts to make them take 15 saves at least 5 have to fail. It works i've tried it.

    Reply With Quote

  7. #7
    Cryage's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    442
    Post Thanks / Like
    ^^ What do you mean it doesn't scatter? It can still scatter, it just can't mishap.

    Reply With Quote

  8. #8
    Eryx_UK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    St. Neots, Cambridgeshire, UK
    Posts
    882
    Post Thanks / Like
    I play against Nids a fair bit and from my experience across table from them, the Trygon is the best of the two.

    Space Marines (Salamanders). W 23 / L 98 / D 28.
    Last Opponent: Blood Angels, 2000pts, Loss!

    St. Neots (Cambs UK) Primarchs games club: http://snprimarchs.weebly.com/

    My 40K Blog: Musings of a Wargamer
    Reply With Quote

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    2,436
    Post Thanks / Like
    Originally Posted by Cryage View Post
    ^^ What do you mean it doesn't scatter? It can still scatter, it just can't mishap.
    I think he meant the Mawloc's large blast doesn't scatter... or I hope that's what was intended.

    Last edited by Sybrite; 9th April 2011 at 12:57. Reason: cant believe I miswrote that the "does" scatter when it 'does not' :P
    Army (W/L/D)
    CSM 0/0/0 (70% painted)
    Tyranid 0/0/0 (updating)
    Eldar 1/1/5
    Reply With Quote

  10. #10
    Alex_H's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Newmarket
    Posts
    62
    Post Thanks / Like
    Blog Entries
    2
    Originally Posted by Sybrite View Post
    I think he meant the Mawloc's large blast does scatter... or I hope that's what was intended.
    Yes it does scatter, but you can choose to target a unit and hope for it not to scatter.

    As for which is best, I would go Trygon over Mawloc all the time. Its so much better in CC than the Mawloc its just silly. If you find they are getting focused fire when they arrive via deep strike, don't deep strike them. Take two start them on the board and run them at your enemy. With fleet and a good run roll you've got a possible 12 inch charge. If the enemy does shoot at them, they won't be shooting at the rest of your army. Its a win win.

    Reply With Quote

  11. #11

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    2,436
    Post Thanks / Like
    actaully the mawloc's terror from the deep attack does not scatter
    the mawloc itself will scatter when deepstriking, but after it's entry point is determined you put the large blast marker over that point and tally any hits/wounds then move aside any remaining models so the mawloc can be placed

    but yes if you're looking for an assault monster the mawloc is not the wisest choice
    and for my own monstrous creature fix, I prefer carnifexes

    Last edited by Sybrite; 9th April 2011 at 13:03.
    Army (W/L/D)
    CSM 0/0/0 (70% painted)
    Tyranid 0/0/0 (updating)
    Eldar 1/1/5
    Reply With Quote

  12. #12
    Cryage's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    442
    Post Thanks / Like
    Originally Posted by Sybrite View Post
    actaully the mawloc's terror from the deep attack does not scatter
    the mawloc itself will scatter when deepstriking, but after it's entry point is determined you put the large blast marker over that point and tally any hits/wounds then move aside any remaining models so the mawloc can be placed

    but yes if you're looking for an assault monster the mawloc is not the wisest choice
    and for my own monstrous creature fix, I prefer carnifexes
    ? Can you be a bit more clear, you just contradicted yourself.

    You state the attack cannot scatter... yet the mawloc scatters and where the mawloc emerges from is the point of entry , thus where the blast marker is placed, so it DOES indeed scatter.

    Reply With Quote

  13. #13
    SourImplant's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    2,795
    Post Thanks / Like
    Blog Entries
    19
    Dude's arguing semantics. The Deep Strike scatters as normal, but the blast marker does not. Not that it makes a whole hell of a lot of difference in the end. Whether the attack itself scatters or the Deep Strike scatters, it comes down to the same result. With the Tyranid FAQ confirming that you can try to Deep Strike on top of an enemy unit on purpose, I don't imagine anyone is going to settle for attempting to come on the table merely close by anything he'd rather be hitting. So, most folks just consider the Deep Strike and the Terror from the Deep attack to be one and the same. Sybrite is just being a bit more literal as to the order of things.


    Originally Posted by Architech
    I figured it was an accident...so don't worry about it.
    Reply With Quote

  14. #14
    tyraniduser287's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    23
    Post Thanks / Like
    you really cant compare the 2 they both have diffferent and wonderful purposes if you want somthing that can destroy in close combat and shoot trygons are your better bet if you want somthing that can destroy infintry and move very quickly around the battle field mawlocs are the way to go

    Reply With Quote

  15. #15

    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    413
    Post Thanks / Like
    Depend of your list. Me i have a trygon and i don t get that problem. But i have 2-3 carnifex , 1-2 tervigon , 0-1 swarmlord , 3-6 warrior , and my trygon. So people can focus my trygon in shooting but if they do , there plenty of other trouble ahead.

    Me i prefer trygon over mawloc but that my choice. Mawloc usually gonna do 2-3 template by game... not good enough for me

    Reply With Quote

  16. #16
    Forum Sock Monkey scythes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Sunny Southern California
    Posts
    8,057
    Post Thanks / Like
    Wow, this thread was 8 months old, no need to necro old threads like this, in fact I'm pretty sure there's something in the rules about it. Just a heads up.

    Scythes Super-Duper Extraordinary Forum Model Swap Program of Awesomeness! (Names Drawn, follow the fun here)

    -Hugs for the hug god! -Edmund Black
    -Some people are like Slinkies. . . completely useless, but they bring a smile to your face when you push them down the stairs.

    3300 Tyranids
    6700 Space Marines
    Reply With Quote

  17. #17

    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    GlensFalls queensbury area
    Posts
    46
    Post Thanks / Like
    It's a matter of your personal play style. I'll puck the mawlock but only If I got 3(each slot) That way they will scatter when they emerge but chances if missing all 3 times is unlikely. Aswell using them to circle/ approach a single unit with ensure some kind of devistation. Tyrgon is good as a single model but preferably with 2 on the board as they can run up the feild and assault almost anything with great success. If you have 3. You could try to use the encircling tactic and use their ranged weapon but not as effective IMO. As the large blast is better amount of damage. So the question is how will you plan to use it?

    Reply With Quote

Similar Threads

  1. Trygon Marker
    By cypher0.9 in forum Tyranids
    Replies: 34
    Last Post: 29th July 2010, 15:02
  2. mawloc
    By gjwoodrffe in forum Tyranids
    Replies: 77
    Last Post: 17th June 2010, 17:53
  3. More problems for Mawloc
    By Nikolai in forum Tyranids
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 18th April 2010, 02:58
  4. trygon prime or mawloc
    By the_true_lion in forum Tyranids
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 5th February 2010, 23:38
  5. Mawloc/Trygon/Trygon Prime?
    By Imperial Dragon in forum Tyranids
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 22nd January 2010, 08:14

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Today’s Posts | Search Warvault Webring
An exclusive design by: ForumSkin